I’m pretty sure this is the first time I’ve seen RStudio starting to integrate with a Jupyter server, and it represents another sign that Jupyter mediated remote code execution environments are starting to become part of a wider ecosystem independently of the Jupyter user interfaces such as Jupyter classic notebook, JupyterLab and RetroLab. This seems to allow you specify a connection to an automatically discovered Jupyter kernel. The visual editor is currently only available bundled into an RStudio preview (there is a visual editor in RStudio, but maybe not as feature rich?) The editor can be used to edit a new project type, a Quarto Project. qmd document format and the Jupyter notebook. the publishing tools (the quarto CLI): command line tools for converting between the new.the visual editor: visual markdown editor that allows toggling between visual preview and source markdown view.The TL:DR as far as Quarto goes is that we can considering the Quarto publishing system in three parts: I also still think we can use things like notebooks to author content across the curriculum for OU-XML mediated publication via the VLE and other “traditional” channels (see various subject specific demos in Subject Matter Authoring Using Jupyter Notebooks, for example, or some notes on generating reusable educational assets particularly in the “generative production” context). We could also author VLE content using notebooks and convert it to OU-XML, or transform legacy content into noteboooks. #JUPYTERLAB MARKDOWN CHEAT SHEET GENERATOR#(Or we might choose to explore Pandoc as a generator of output format documents too.) And as more modules show an interest in using Jupyter notebooks, we could also use OU-XML, vis Pandoc conversion, to gold-master notebooks if anyone really felt the need to. That and the fact that they have been using Pandoc since forever for knitr and bookdwon publishing workflows, and were already on the way to developing a rich visual editor as part of RStudio.įor me, the ability to point to a visual editor already hooked into Pandoc is a timely piece of evidence I can appeal to as to why Pandoc makes sense as part of an (authoring and) publishing system: even if we only use it for generating previews, if Pandoc can be used to export the created content into OU-XML, we can continue to use our current publishing processes to render content published to students. And they have not unreasonably taken the view that using Markdown as a base document format, albeit with certain extensions, simplifies the tooling on the editor side. The folk over at RStudio have obviously seen value in Pandoc as a tool for generating a wide range of potential output document types, including PDF, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, HTML slides and EPUB ebooks, as well good ol’ HTML. To create a conversion utility for converting between OU-XML and markdown, to support the production of FutureLearn courses and Microcredentials.To create a conversion utility to support the conversion between OU-XML and Jupyter notebook (ipynb) formats, to support Computing, Mathematics, and Statistics modules currently in production.(I say “recently”, but I’ve been idly pitching it once every few months or so for at least a couple of years. This is of particular interest to me at the moment giving I’ve recently been lobbying internally for Pandoc support for OU-XML. Picking up on Noting: the Quarto Rich Authoring Environment for Generative Texts, here’s a quick review of a few things that jumped out at me about Quarto, “ scientific and technical publishing system built on Pandoc”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |